National Health Technology Assessment Research Articles

Implementing the EU HTA regulation: Insights from semi-structured interviews on patient expectations, Belgian and European institutional perspectives, and industry outlooks.

Introduction: The goal of the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Regulation 2021/2282 is to establish a more harmonized HTA framework, fostering member states cooperation and enabling equal patient access to innovative health technologies in Europe. This research aimed to assess the impact of the regulation on national HTAs, the strategic implications for health technology developers, and its influence on price and reimbursement negotiations. Methods: A scoping literature review encompassing peer-reviewed literature as well as grey literature was conducted. Between February and March 2023, semi-structured interviews (n = 20) were performed with stakeholders from Belgian governmental institutions, European institutions, advanced therapy medicinal product developers, academics, and sickness funds. The interviews were analyzed using the framework analysis method. Results: Numerous steps, such as the development of implementing acts and procedural guidelines remain to be taken. At member state level, national/regional HTA bodies and payers must act to adopt the new concepts of Joint Scientific Consultations (JSC) and Joint Clinical Assessments (JCA) within their national legislation, as well as revise their timelines and prepare for interactions at a European level. Compiling a harmonized PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome), adapting local procedures, and increasing capacity to actively take part in the JSC and JCA are seen as primary barriers by several stakeholders. Training and education will help HTA bodies, payers, and health technology developers to participate in the European processes. Conclusion: While practical and legal challenges were identified, recommendations (such as actively preparing for the upcoming changes and increasing capacity while providing training) were provided to adapt national and European procedures to the needs of the HTA Regulation 2021/2282. The importance of fostering collaborations and aligning local HTA procedures with the new way of working set out by the Regulation was demonstrated with this study.

An Inclusive Civil Society Dialogue for Successful Implementation of the EU HTA Regulation: Call to Action to Ensure Appropriate Involvement of Stakeholders and Collaborators.

Stakeholder involvement has long been considered a success factor for a joint European health technology assessment (HTA) process, and its relevance is now anchored in the EU HTA Regulation's (EU HTAR) legislative wording. Therefore, we aimed to explore the roles, challenges, and most important activities to increase the level of involvement per stakeholder group. At the 2022 Fall Convention of the European Access Academy (EAA), working groups addressed the involvement of patients, clinicians, regulators, health technology developers (HTD), and national HTA bodies and payers within the EU HTA process. Each working group revisited the pre-convention survey results, determined key role characteristics for each stakeholder, and agreed on the most important activities to fulfill the role profile. Finally, the activities suggested per group were prioritized by plenary group. The prioritized actions for patients included training and capacity building, the establishment of a patient involvement committee, and the establishment of a patient unit at the EC secretariat. For clinicians, it included alignment on evidence assessment from a clinical vs. HTA point of view, capacity building, and standardization of processes. The most important actions for regulators are to develop joint regulatory-HTA guidance documents, align processes and interfaces under the regulation, and share discussions on post-licensing evidence generation. HTDs prioritized scientific advice capacity and the review of the scoping process, and further development of the scope of the assessment report fact checks. The top three actions for national HTA bodies and payers included clarification on the early HTD dialogue process, political support and commitment, and clarification on financial support. Addressing the activities identified as the most important for stakeholders/collaborators in the EU HTA process (e.g., in the implementation of the EU HTA Stakeholder Network and of the guidance documents developed by the EUnetHTA 21 consortium) will be key to starting an "inclusive civil society dialogue", as suggested by the European Commission's Pharmaceutical Strategy.

Give Due Consideration …

Abstract The new EU Regulation on health technology assessment (HTAR) provides for joint clinical assessments (JCA) of health technologies at EU level. When Member States carry out health technology assessments (HTA) at the national level, they shall give due consideration to the results of a JCA and comply with other obligations of the Regulation. This article aims to clarify what these obligations mean for the Member States and whether JCA results have to be considered outside a national health technology assessment as well. In this context, the question of which processes qualify as ‘national HTA’ and which requirements need to be fulfilled to trigger the obligations under Article 13 HTAR are discussed in more detail in this paper.

Pediatric Market Access: A Qualitative Study.

This qualitative study aims to analyze current PM regulation and market access requirements and proposes potential solutions to mitigate current challenges. Twenty-two semi-structured interviews were conducted with experts from pharmaceutical industry, regulatory authorities, national health technology assessment (HTA) bodies, pediatricians, and academia from the Netherlands (NL), Germany (DE), the United Kingdom (UK), and France (FR) to get insight into the pediatric research, the regulatory and reimbursement processes, challenges, and solutions. Themes for further testing were developed on how to facilitate pediatric market access. Atlas.ti 9 was used to analyze the findings. Heterogeneity in requirements for the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and HTA approvals are noted. By example, DE grants direct reimbursement after regulatory approval, the other countries require additional reimbursement which generate delays and challenges in patient access after marketing authorization. Key components in facilitating PM market access include multi-stakeholder collaboration, transparency, patient representatives, informed consent guidance, real-world evidence, and appropriate clinical trial designs. Pricing models based on the economic capabilities of individual countries could further reduce delays and challenges in market access. The additional specific pediatric incentives should be taken as best practice to encourage innovation in pediatric conditions. This study highlights differences in requirements for regulatory and reimbursement approval, along with international differences in pricing and reimbursement procedures for pediatric market access.

Health Technology Assessment in China’s Health Care Sector: Development and Applications

ABSTRACT China’s health system is facing severe challenges from social transition and the double burden of population aging and non-communicable diseases. Addressing the tension between the public’s increasing demand for health services and the limited availability of medical resources has become a critical issue for health care policymakers and medical insurance fund administrators. In promoting its medical insurance system reform, China is actively developing health technology assessment (HTA) with principles and applications adapted to the Chinese context. This study aims to analyze the evolution of HTA in China with a focus on context, actors, process, content, and challenges encountered through applying a modified verson of Walt and Gilson’s policy triangle framework. Currently, HTA plays an indispensable part in the reform of China’s health care and medical insurance system, especially in the formulation and adjustment of the National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL). While HTA is increasingly used in China, there remain challenges, such as the slow development of HTA related disciplines, lack of an independent national HTA authority, and limited scope in the use of HTA. Despite the identified challenges, HTA has the potential to support a wide range of applications in China’s health care sector, building on the progress achieved over the last three decades.

OP109 The Conceptualization And Value Of A Disease Management Approach To HTA In Canada: Findings From A Qualitative Study

IntroductionOur objective was to conceptualize and assess the potential value of a disease management approach to health technology assessment (HTA) in Canada.MethodsWe conducted 18 semi-structured interviews between April 2022 and October 2022 to elicit informant views on potential opportunities for re-conceptualizing the decision-problem in HTA as a disease management problem versus a technology management problem. Participants were purposefully sampled from national and provincial HTA agencies and related organizations in Canada to achieve representation across the disease pathway including prevention, screening, and treatment, and the decision-making pathway including HTA organizations, expert committee members, and decision-makers. Data were analyzed using thematic organizations (based on the interview guide) and manual line by line coding of the data. Ethics approval was received from the Health Sciences Research Ethics Board at the University of Toronto.ResultsThree key features of a disease management approach to HTA (i.e., disease-based, multi-interventional, and dynamic) emerged from informants that differed from traditional HTA processes in Canada. The concept was generally not perceived to be a new idea – some informants indicating that it was implicit in the HTA analysis framework. There was general support for an explicit disease management approach to HTA if the impact of the approach could be demonstrated, if the assessment could be completed within an appropriate time frame, and if the assessment could include the equity, ethical and implementation domains of HTA. Informants indicated that the reconceptualization of HTA could lead to effective and efficient decision-making throughout a technology’s lifecycle, help breakdown system silos, and offer a platform for greater consideration of non-drug alternatives and upstream interventions. The impact of this approach was anticipated to contribute to a proactive health system that could improve population health, enhance the patient experience, and ensure appropriate stewardship of health care resources.ConclusionsA disease management approach to HTA has international relevance as an approach that could promote integrated, proactive, sustainable, and resilient health systems.

Recent changes to adult national immunization programs for pneumococcal vaccination in Europe and how they impact coverage: A systematic review of published and grey literature

ABSTRACT Despite widespread use of pneumococcal vaccines throughout Europe, the burden of pneumococcal disease (PD) in adults is considerable. To mitigate this burden, National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) agencies assess the value of different vaccine schedules for protecting against PD. The aim of this review was to assess the evidence and rationales used by NITAGs/HTA agencies, when considering recent changes to National Immunization Programs (NIPs) for adults, and how identified changes affected vaccine coverage rates (VCRs). A systematic review was conducted of published literature from PubMed® and Embase®, and gray literature from HTA/NITAG websites from the last 5 y, covering 31 European countries. Evidence related to NIP recommendations, epidemiology (invasive PD, pneumonia), health economic assessments and VCRs were collected and synthesized. Eighty-four records providing data for 26 countries were identified. Of these, eight described explicit changes to NIPs for adults in seven countries. Despite data gaps, some trends were observed; first, there appears to be a convergence of NIP recommendations in many countries toward sequential vaccination, with a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), followed by pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine 23. Second, reducing economic or healthcare burden were common rationales for implementing changes. Third, most health economic analyses assessing higher-valency PCVs for adults found its inclusion in NIPs cost-effective. Finally, higher coverage rates were seen in most cases where countries had expanded their NIPs to cover at-risk populations. The findings can encourage agencies to improve surveillance systems and work to reach the NIP’s target populations more effectively.

Medicak techniligies assesment in COVID-19

According to official information about the coronavirus, as of May 2023, about 400 thousand people died from COVID-19 in Russia, 6.9 million people in the world. Social, as well as medical and economic aspects are associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. The main global financial resources were allocated to the provision of vaccines ($13.8 billion, 40.4%); reorganization of health systems ($4.1 billion); COVID-19 drug therapy ($3.4 billion). The costs of research, development and study of vaccines and medicines accounted for only 0.6% of total costs ($166 million). The article presents a clinical and pharmacological analysis of various medicines recommended for the treatment of infection. In these conditions, the reliability and effectiveness of national health technology assessment systems has become particularly relevant.

Mapping the characteristics, concepts and methodologies of matching-adjusted indirect comparison studies assessing pharmacological therapies in oncology: a scoping review protocol

IntroductionMatching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) studies are a subtype of indirect comparison, which uses propensity score weighting to enhance comparability. This method adjusts aggregated data based on covariables from individual patient...

HTA102 Early Scientific Advice in Europe: An Overview of Processes and Requirements

Early scientific advice comprises a systematic process through which national Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies provide manufacturers with guidance on their clinical development strategy, aiming to improve the quality of evidence to be submitted. The purpose of this study was to describe the main features characterizing these procedures in scope European countries.

HTA11 Challenges in Establishing a National Health Technology Assessment Agency in the United States: Insight from Low- and Middle-Income Countries

In 2022, legislators in the US responded to a long-standing problem of high drug costs for patients by giving the government the power to negotiate in its Medicare program. To engage this new negotiation power, the government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) may need to formally avail itself of health technology assessments (HTAs). As the US considers establishing a national HTA agency to conduct HTAs through Medicare, it will face numerous challenges. This paper seeks to identify some of those challenges using insight from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with recently established national HTA agencies.

Health technology assessment for cancer medicines across the G7 countries and Oceania: an international, cross-sectional study.

Criticisms have emerged that cancer medicines offer modest benefits at increasingly high prices. Reimbursement decisions made by health technology assessment (HTA) agencies have become a complex endeavour for cancer medicines. Most high-income countries (HICs) use HTA criteria to identify high-value medicines for reimbursement under public drug coverage plans. We compared HTA criteria specific for cancer medicines in economically similar HICs, to understand how these criteria contribute to reimbursement decisions. We did an international, cross-sectional analysis in collaboration with author investigators across eight HICs, from the Group of Seven (known as G7; Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan) and Oceania (Australia and New Zealand). Publicly available data from HTA agency reports and official documentation were extracted and analysed between Aug 15, 2021, and July 31, 2022. We collected data pertaining to the decision-making criteria used by the national HTA agency; HTA reimbursement status for 34 medicine-indication pairs corresponding to 15 unique US top-selling cancer medicines; and HTA reimbursement status for 18 cancer medicine-indication pairs (13 unique medicines) with minimal clinical benefit (score of 1 on the European Society of Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale). Descriptive statistics were used to compare HTA decision criteria and drug reimbursement recommendations (or for Germany and Japan, final reimbursement status) across the eight countries. Therapeutic impact related to clinical outcomes of the new medicine was a uniform criterion across the eight countries, whereas quality of evidence (under the remit of therapeutic impact assessment) and equity were infrequently cited criteria. Only the German HTA agency mandated that surrogate endpoints be validated in therapeutic impact assessment. All countries except Germany included formal cost-effectiveness analyses within HTA reports. England and Japan were the only countries that specified a cost-effectiveness threshold. Of the 34 medicine-indication pairs corresponding to US top-selling cancer medicines, Germany reimbursed the maximum (34 [100%]), followed by Italy (32 [94%] recommended for reimbursement), Japan (28 [82%] reimbursed), Australia, Canada, England, and France (27 [79%] recommended for reimbursement), and New Zealand (12 [35%] recommended for reimbursement). Of the 18 cancer medicine-indication pairs with marginal clinical benefit, Germany reimbursed 15 (83%) and Japan reimbursed 12 (67%). France recommended nine (50%) for reimbursement, followed by Italy (seven [39%]), Canada (five [28%]), and Australia and England (three [17%] each). New Zealand did not recommend any medicine-indications with marginal clinical benefit for reimbursement. Considering the overall cumulative proportion across the eight countries, 58 (21%) of 272 indications for the US top-selling medicines and 90 (63%) of 144 marginally beneficial medicine-indications were not recommended for reimbursement or reimbursed. Our findings indicate discordance in public reimbursement decisions across economically similar countries, despite overlapping HTA decision criteria. This suggests a need for improved transparency around the nuances of the criteria to ensure improved access to high-value cancer medicines, and deprioritisation of low-value cancer medicines. Health systems have opportunities to improve their HTA decision-making processes by learning from the systems in other countries. None.

Added Therapeutic Benefit of Top-Selling Brand-name Drugs in Medicare

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 authorizes Medicare to negotiate prices of top-selling drugs based on several factors, including therapeutic benefit compared with existing treatment options. To determine the added therapeutic benefit of the 50 top-selling brand-name drugs in Medicare in 2020, as assessed by health technology assessment (HTA) organizations in Canada, France, and Germany. In this cross-sectional study, publicly available therapeutic benefit ratings, US Food and Drug Administration documents, and the Medicare Part B and Part D prescription drug spending dashboards were used to determine the 50 top-selling single-source drugs used in Medicare in 2020 and to assess their added therapeutic benefit ratings through 2021. Ratings from HTA bodies in Canada, France, and Germany were categorized as high (moderate or greater) or low (minor or no) added benefit. Each drug was rated based on its most favorable rating across countries, indications, subpopulations, and dosage forms. We compared the use and prerebate and postrebate (ie, net) Medicare spending between drugs with high vs low added benefit. Forty-nine drugs (98%) received an HTA rating by at least 1 country; 22 of 36 drugs (61%) received a low added benefit rating in Canada, 34 of 47 in France (72%), and 17 of 29 in Germany (59%). Across countries, 27 drugs (55%) had a low added therapeutic rating, accounting for $19.3 billion in annual estimated net spending, or 35% of Medicare net spending on the 50 top-selling single-source drugs and 11% of total Medicare net prescription drug spending in 2020. Compared with those with high added benefit, drugs with a low added therapeutic rating were used by more Medicare beneficiaries (median 387 149 vs 44 869) and had lower net spending per beneficiary (median $992 vs $32 287). Many top-selling Medicare drugs received low added benefit ratings by the national HTA organizations of Canada, France, and Germany. When negotiating prices for these drugs, Medicare should ensure they are not priced higher than reasonable therapeutic alternatives.

Time to reimbursement of novel anticancer drugs in Europe: a case study of seven European countries

Time to reimbursement (TTR) of new anticancer medicines differs between countries and contributes to unequal access. We aimed to investigate TTR of new anticancer medicines and explore factors influencing the reimbursement process in seven high-income European countries. We carried out a retrospective case study of anticancer medicines with European Union Market Access (EU-MA) and a positive Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use opinion from 2016 until 2021 with subsequent national reimbursement approval (NRA). The National Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and reimbursement websites of Germany, France, UK, the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway and Switzerland were used to identify TTR, defined as time from EU-MA to NRA. Additionally, we investigated medication-, country-, indication- and pharma-related factors potentially influencing TTR. Thirty-five medicines were identified for which TTR ranged from -81 days to 2320 days (median 407 days). At data cut-off, 16 (46%) were reimbursed in all seven countries. Overall, the shortest TTR was in Germany (median 3 days, all medicines reimbursed <5 days). The time limit for reimbursement of 180 days stated by the Council of European Communities after the EU-MA (EU Transparency Directive) was met for 100% of included medicines in Germany, 51% in France, 29% in the UK and the Netherlands, 14% in Switzerland, 6% in Norway and 3% in Belgium. The TTR was significantly different between countries (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with shorter TTR were higher gross domestic product (GDP), absence of a pre-assessment procedure and submission by a big pharmaceutical company. TTR of anticancer medicines varies significantly between seven high-income European countries and leads to inequality in access. Among explored medication-, country-, indication- and pharma-related factors we found that a high GDP, the absence of a pre-assessment procedure and submission by big pharmaceutical companies were associated with shorter TTR.

National Health Technology Assessment in Turkiye after a decade: Are key principles followed?

Health technology assessment (HTA) is growing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to ensure optimal use of limited resources. However, the impact of HTAs on decision making in LMICs has been limited. The study aimed to provide an overview of Turkiye's progress since establishing the first HTA agency in 2012. The web sites of three national HTA agencies in Turkiye were searched for HTA guidelines and national HTA reports. The HTA guidelines were assessed by two researchers independently against the key principles of HTA developed by Drummond et al., and the HTA reports against the national guidelines. The study included one HTA guideline and eight national HTA reports. The guideline included very limited technical guidance. Compliance with the principles was poor to moderate, and significant methodological limitations were identified. The reports were inconsistent regarding the scope and the HTA assessment criteria. The link between HTA findings, HTA decision making, and health policies were not clear. The inconsistencies between the reports and the methodological limitations demonstrate the need for national HTA guidelines. Improving the characteristics of the HTA might impact implementation. Among the key issues is transparency regarding priority setting, the HTA process, and decision making. Establishing and adopting national HTA guidelines at international standards is needed. Involving external scientific committees and health economists in the HTA processes might help ensure that the key principles of HTA are followed. The study findings might be helpful for countries that are developing their HTA systems.

Evolution of Pneumococcal Vaccine Recommendations and Criteria for Decision Making in 5 Western European Countries and the United States.

Pneumococcal vaccine recommendations have become increasingly complex. This study aims to understand how national immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs) and health technology assessment (HTA) agencies of 5 European countries and the United States formed their pneumococcal vaccine recommendations, by providing reviewed evidence and key drivers for new recommendations. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, and National Health Authorities Web sites were screened to capture the evolution of pneumococcal recommendations. A narrative review was conducted on NITAGs and HTA bodies' Web sites. Assessments of pneumococcal vaccines published from 2009 to 2022 were included. Thirty-four records were identified including 21 assessments for risk groups, 17 for elderly, and 12 for children. Burden of disease and vaccine characteristics were almost systematically reviewed during assessments. All 6 countries recommended the use of higher-valent pneumococcal vaccine (PCV; i.e., PCV10 and PCV13) in childhood vaccination programs, given their broader serotype coverage and their comparable profile to PCV7. PCV13 was progressively added to the vaccine schedule (in addition to polysaccharide vaccine) in at least the high-risk group, given the high burden in this population and expected additional benefits of PCV13. For the elderly, unlike the United States, European countries issued negative recommendation for PCV13 routine use because of substantial herd effects from childhood vaccination program making PCV13 likely not cost-effective. This research provides an overview of decision-making processes for higher-valent PCVs recommendations and could be of interest to anticipate the place of next generation of PCVs in the vaccination landscape. By describing evidence-based criteria for decision making, this study emphasizes the framework analysis of NITAGs and HTA bodies when assessing pneumococcal vaccines and demonstrates that variation exists between countries and also according to population evaluated.While the burden of disease and immunogenicity/efficacy data were almost systematically reviewed by national stakeholders, economic assessments were reported to a lesser extent but played a major role in the limited use of PCV13 in the adult population.

Evaluation of the safety, efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of implantable Holter for prolonged monitoring in patients with previous stroke: a systematic review.

Atrial fibrillation (AF), which is associated with cryptogenic stroke, is the most common sustained arrhythmia in the general population. Because AF is asymptomatic and intermittent, its detection rate increases with the duration of monitoring. The objective of this study is to review the available evidence on the safety, efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of AF diagnosis by prolonged monitoring with an implantable Holter monitor in adult patients with idiopathic or cryptogenic stroke of suspected cardioembolic origin, compared to conventional monitoring. Two independent reviewers performed a systematic review of the literature, identifying relevant studies through a structured search of Medline (Ovid), EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library and the databases of national and international health technology assessment agencies. The quality of the included studies was assessed with AGREE-II, AMSTAR-2 and CHEC. GRADE criteria were used to summarise the evidence. Four of the 211 papers identified were included: 1 clinical practice guideline, 2 systematic reviews, and 1 economic evaluation. The quality of the evidence reviewed was low. An implantable Holter monitor might be more effective in detecting AF than conventional monitoring. Serious adverse events were similar in both groups. The economic evaluation suggests that the technology is cost-effective. The available evidence suggests the diagnostic superiority of the implantable Holter monitor over the traditional Holter monitor. Due to the low quality of the evidence, further and higher quality studies on these technologies are needed before solid conclusions can be drawn.

Institutionalizing health technology assessment in Ethiopia: seizing the window of opportunity.

Ethiopia's commitment to achieving universal health coverage (UHC) requires an efficient and equitable health priority-setting practice. The Ministry of Health aims to institutionalize health technology assessment (HTA) to support evidence-based decision making. This commentary highlights key considerations for successful formulation, adoption, and implementation of HTA policies and practices in Ethiopia, based on a review of international evidence and published normative principles and guidelines. Stakeholder engagement, transparent policymaking, sustainable financing, workforce education, and political economy analysis and power dynamics are critical factors that need to be considered when developing a national HTA roadmap and implementation strategy. To ensure ownership and sustainability of HTA, effective stakeholder engagement and transparency are crucial. Regulatory embedding and sustainable financing ensure legitimacy and continuity of HTA production, and workforce education and training are essential for conducting and interpreting HTA. Political economy analysis helps identify opportunities and constraints for effective HTA implementation. By addressing these considerations, Ethiopia can establish a well-designed HTA system to inform evidence-based and equitable resource allocation toward achieving UHC and improving health outcomes.

PP97 Recommendations For Generating South African Health-Related Quality Of Life Data For Cost-Utility Analyses

IntroductionHealth-related quality of life (HRQoL) data are necessary for conducting cost-utility analyses (CUAs) as part of health technology assessments (HTAs), but the lack of robust HRQoL data may delay or even prevent patient access to medicines when National Health Insurance is introduced in South Africa. This study aimed to make recommendations for evidence generation activities to support national HTA in the public health sector, with a focus on creating South African HRQoL data suitable for CUAs.MethodsA systematic review of HRQoL research in South Africa formed the basis for three analyses. The first analysis quantified and evaluated the suitability of HRQoL studies for CUAs. The second analysis determined the performance indicators of the research output and identified collaborative networks through bibliometric analyses. The third analysis critiqued the translation methodology of the HRQoL instruments retrieved in the systematic review.ResultsBased on the published literature, existing HRQoL data are unlikely to support CUAs because they were derived from observational or cross-sectional studies that lacked the methodological details necessary to determine their scientific merit according to HTA requirements. Overall, there was a lack of research continuity in this field, with numerous isolated research networks. Despite the strong contribution of South African based researchers and organizations in this area, their performance was below that of international counterparts. Since only a few HRQoL instruments suitable for CUAs would be valid in the South African context, HRQoL research output in South Africa could be optimized by using more rigorous study designs and by the expansion of researcher networks to include those working in HTA and related fields. The three-level EQ-5D is the tool best suited for use in South Africa, so its utilization should be encouraged and supported by establishing a South African value set.ConclusionsFuture data generation activities should incorporate the recommendations from this study because existing South African HRQoL data are likely to be inadequate for conducting CUAs in national HTA.

PP146 The Use Of Indirect Comparisons For Reimbursement Decision Making In The Netherlands And England

IntroductionReimbursement decision making is based on a relative effectiveness assessment (REA), which may be combined with a cost-effectiveness assessment, by national Health Technology Assessment (HTA) agencies. These assessments are based on clinical data where new interventions are compared to the current standard of care, which may differ between countries. Since most pivotal trials only include a limited number of interventions, indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) can be used to compare multiple interventions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ITCs in HTA decision making in the Netherlands and England.MethodsAll pharmaceutical assessments published between 2015 and 2019 by the National Health Care Institute (ZIN) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) were reviewed to determine whether an ITC had been used. For detailed analysis we included all assessments of ZIN using an ITC, and a random sample of assessments of NICE using an ITC (10 assessments per publication year).ResultsBetween 2015 and 2019 a total of 106 and 265 assessments were conducted by ZIN and NICE, respectively. Of these assessments 48 from ZIN and 150 from NICE included an ITC. The detailed analysis showed that pharmaceutical assessments including indirect comparative evidence led to the REA conclusion of similar therapeutic evidence in 57 percent of 48 assessments by ZIN and in 52 percent of 50 assessments by NICE. Reimbursement recommendations including indirect comparative evidence most often resulted in positive recommendations by ZIN (57% assessments), and in restricted recommendations by NICE (50% assessments). Different methods were employed to incorporate indirect comparative evidence, such as naïve ITCs and network meta-analysis.ConclusionsOur results showed a significant variability in the use of ITCs between NICE and ZIN, which may contribute to differences in their recommendations. Further analysis will provide deeper insight in these differences and may provide suggestions for a clearer international guidance on the use of ITCs for HTA.